Lindsay Lohan turns down $700k to pose topless in Playboy

IT’S once nude, twice shy for Lindsay Lohan. The Sapphic-leaning star has turned down a $700,000 offer to do an eight-page topless spread in Playboy’s 55th-anniversary issue this January. “If there’s nudity, then the answer’s no . . . She’s not going down the [New York] magazine road again,” Lohan’s rep told Playboy’s creative consultant, Hal Lifson, referring to Lindsay’s naked Marilyn Monroe tribute last winter. Lifson said he hoped to have Lohan do a tribute to ’60s sex kitten Ann-Margret and her film “Kitten With a Whip,” which is one of Lohan’s faves.

[From the New York Post]

Lohan really isn’t in any position to be turning down any work according to most insiders. For the last few years she’s been consistently reported to be pretty cash strapped. $700,000 is a lot of purses. Not only has she posed naked in the very recent past for New York Magazine, but she dresses in a manner to ensure that she’s constantly giving nipple slips to any guy who will so much as pass her the butter. Normally I wouldn’t be encouraging someone who doesn’t want to go topless to bare the goods, but in her case what’s the harm? It’s nothing we haven’t seen (in excess) before.

Here’s Lindsay on the set of “Ugly Betty” with America Ferrera in New York yesterday. Photographer: Hugh Dillon. Images thanks to WENN.

DISCLAIMER: This posting was submitted by a user of the site not from The Insider editorial staff. All users have acknowledged and agreed that the submission of their story and its contents is in compliance with our Terms of Use.