“The court order of 2007 provided that Roan was to go to school in San Francisco. Sharon went to court to try and modify the existing order,” he said.
“She wanted the court to modify the order so her child could go to school in Los Angeles. But the court felt that, for whatever reason, that she did not meet a burden to move him out of San Francisco during the school year.”
Sharon - who also has adopted sons Laird Vonne Stone, three, and two-year-old Quinn Kelly - reportedly wanted Roan to live closer to her so he could bond with her other children.
The papers state there is to be no change in Sharon’s “custody, visitation, holiday and vacation schedule” and order that her telephone number is programmed into Roan’s phones.
“Sharon not lost any iota of custody or visitation that she had before,” Singer said.”
So my entire point in this is that I don’t understand why everyone is so all over Stone about how she has ‘lost custody’ when really, you can’t lose something that you never had. And people are also talking about they wonder who’s taking care of the other children back home when this is clearly not a situation of neglect or abuse…she wanted him to change schools for Pete’s sake! As I mentioned earlier, I’m not a huge fan of this star in the first place but in this instance, I think people need to give her a break. She wanted something, she didn’t get it. Does that make her a horrible person?
DISCLAIMER: This posting was submitted by a user of the site not from The Insider editorial staff. All users have acknowledged and agreed that the submission of their story and its contents is in compliance with our Terms of Use.
Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Comments (0)