Miley Cyrus - Very First Scandalous Photo Shoot

I’m guessing Miley Cyrus is roughly six years old in the photo below, posing seductively with her midriff exposed.


Clearly her parents are to blame. Would you allow your six year old child to pose this way in photos? Be sure to check out the look on her face in the third thumbnail.

[Click thumbnails for a larger view]
Published 12/13/08 by


Allie Is Wired

DISCLAIMER: This posting was submitted by a user of the site not from The Insider editorial staff. All users have acknowledged and agreed that the submission of their story and its contents is in compliance with our Terms of Use.

Comments (12)

  • orLogin
  • you look nice
    Anonymous 9/5/09 Reply
  • jay: she is still the same old little girl..i luv her...she rocks...
    Anonymous 8/22/09 Reply
  • miley cyrus is the best singer in the world and she is beautiful
    Anonymous 7/21/09 Reply
  • she is so sexy i want to be like her mmmmmuuuuuuuaaaaa!!!!

    I will give anything to be one day with her .

    driming ....
    Anonymous 7/15/09 Reply
  • Uh! She is so kute
    Anonymous 6/21/09 Reply
  • hej Miley du är helt parfekt din röst, hår, ögon, tänder, kropp du ser alltid så bra ut ååååååååååååååååååhhhhhhhhhhhh. om jag unde byta kropp så skulle det bli din (gråt) jag vill vara dig (gggrrråååttt)

    love emma
    Anonymous 6/17/09 Reply
  • wow! love the pics. she was really pretty. not thas she isnt now. wich she is!!!
    Melissa
    xoxo
    Anonymous 4/29/09 Reply
  • ya'll some dumb ass bitches ya'll can kiss her white skinny ass and you can kiss my big all ya'll are some dumb mutha ing hoes
    Anonymous 4/20/09 Reply
  • that picture is so photoshopped
    Anonymous 4/6/09 Reply
  • Miley I like your little Photo. How old you?
    Anonymous 2/17/09 Reply
  • too beautifull
    Anonymous 2/17/09 Reply
  • oh my god. Your on children its so much like my cousin Amira and you so cute you know it. Can you take your signature in online? please for Hannah Montana and Miley Cyrus Fans.
    Anonymous 2/17/09 Reply