"michael Jackson Is Not The Biological Father", Says Debbie Rowe

Debbie Rowe, the former dermatology receptionist who shocked the world when she married Michael Jackson in 1996, has confessed that the late pop icon was not the biological father of her 12-year-old son Prince Michael and Paris Katherine, 11.


“It was a place in both of our lives when we were both very lonely. We both loved animals. That’s how we got talking.”Debbie says she agreed to have Michael’s children after he told her that his first wife, Lisa Marie Presley, had refused to have any with him.

“Michael was divorced, lonely and wanted children. I was the one who said to him, ‘I will have your babies,’” Debbie says in a new interview with Britain’s News of the World. “I offered him my womb - it was a gift. It was something I did to keep him happy….I was just the vessel. It wasn’t Michael’s sperm,” she says. “I went to the ‘office’, which is what we called the medical clinic. They impregnated me.”

“I got paid for it, and I’ve moved on. I know I will never see my children again.”

Debbie says she never had sex with her then-husband, who she accuses of callously kicking her to the curb after a rough delivery with Paris left her unable to bare anymore children.

“He never wanted to live with me. That’s why he bought me a house. There was always ‘my house’ and ‘his house’, never ‘our house.’”

“He wanted to pretend that we were a family. But we never lived together as a couple. We never had sex. He was on the road, doing his thing,” Debbie explains.

“The delivery was so hard. My insides were all torn up and I was barren. When he knew I couldn’t have any more babies he didn’t want anything to do with me.”
SOURCE View blog reactions
Published 6/29/09 by

tinselgurus 169 tinselgurus

DISCLAIMER: This posting was submitted by a user of the site not from The Insider editorial staff. All users have acknowledged and agreed that the submission of their story and its contents is in compliance with our Terms of Use.

Comments (29)

  • orLogin
  • first of all a close friend of debbies said she never gave this interview at all! just another tabliod trash making things up!! Debbie and MJ always said they were his!! They look like him
    Anonymous 10/27/09 Reply
  • ohhhhhhhhhh soo she knew he wasnot the farther dat lady wild y do that u married him un wow i am soory 4 those kids
    m.jwife 4ever
    Anonymous 9/23/09 Reply
  • And my daughter is now a professional singer, who I have trained and coached, with a lot of influence from Micheal Jackson. Maybe you will see her in the spotlight soon!!! ( the next Beyonce) lol.
    Anonymous 8/16/09 Reply
  • Not to mention that Micheal was never "dark" skinned; he was darker before, but not very dark. None of the Jacksons have dark, complexions, look how light La toya and Janet are. I see mixed people every day that look like those kids-light olive...
    Anonymous 8/16/09 Reply
  • This story is full of lies! I just saw an interview that Debbie did with Geraldo Rivera where she defended Micheal and said that if he wanted her to have 5 more children, she would in a heartbeat. Also; as far as the children not being his because...
    Anonymous 8/16/09 Reply
  • hey debbie, if you need some money i will give you ... but DON T say this stupit and nasty things....
    Anonymous 7/15/09 Reply
  • those are Michael's children... if you don t know please don't leave your stupit comments here.. you need to learn Michael's life before judging him... i'm really shocked cause most of you are living in UK or USA but you are still thinking the...
    Anonymous 7/15/09 Reply
    • SHAME ON DEBBİE ROW !!!!
      Anonymous 7/15/09
  • Blanket looks alot like MJ!
    Anonymous 7/14/09 Reply
  • u people should let MJ rest in peace.why all this talk about the paternity of his children.atleast he was their father when he was alive.why cant we all close this case.for the sake of the children.debbie should let sleeping dog lie,cos i believe...
    Anonymous 7/14/09 Reply
  • Michael doesn't look like Michael, how the hell can his kids look like him?
    Anonymous 7/14/09 Reply
  • Why would Ms. Rowe reveal this prior ro Michael's death? The fact that she is revealing this now is not a heinous act. And really folks, if she did not have sex with him, putting aside any genetic disputes, obviously they are in vitro products....
    Anonymous 7/9/09 Reply
  • I am almost 99.9% sure that Joe Jackson had Michael emasculated. This is a rumor that needs to be answere. The emasculation of Michael answers many questions. In viewing his early performances as a child he was very masculine then he gradually...
    Anonymous 7/8/09 Reply
  • That's perfectly right. It was obvious that Michael is not the father of the kids, hence the fact that they used to hide the children's face. I just find t so sad that Debbie Row has to reveal this story now, just because she's mad at Mike for...
    Anonymous 7/6/09 Reply
  • i had noticed it,but i live in iran and i dont have access to international network,and on the other hand speed of technology is so high,and money make any thing,i thought he asked doctors to make changing in his sperm!
    Anonymous 7/4/09 Reply
  • Debbie is just been wicked, why is she telling us this story now, for all i know those children are michael's chidren, she can go to hell for all i care, a deal is a deal, infact i dont believe her, she better be careful
    Anonymous 6/30/09 Reply