Update: Custody of Michael Jackson's Kids

Report: A Michael Jackson Doctor ID'd
Copyright 2009 Dave Hogan / Getty Images
An attorney for Debbie Rowe is speaking out about whether Rowe will pursue custody of her two children with Michael Jackson.

Echoing what "The Insider" reported from its sources earlier this morning, Rowe's attorney tells the Associated Press that she is still deciding whether to seek custody of her children with Jackson, son Michael "Prince" and daughter Paris-Michael.

"The Insider" can also confirm that the custody hearing has been rescheduled to Monday, July 13 at 8:30 a.m.

Published 7/2/09 by the Insider

Comments (47)

  • orLogin
  • I think the children should live with there grandmother. If anything should happen to Mrs. Jackson the children should go to live with another Jackson family member like Janet. If Debbie Rowe wanted her children why did she walk out on them once...
    Anonymous 8/3/09 Reply
  • They should leave them children alone an let them have some peace. Beacuse they just lost there father regardless if the children is really his or not because in my eyes he raised them from birth.
    Anonymous 7/30/09 Reply
  • i think the kids should go with Michael Jackson sister Janet Jackson to look after them because she loved Michael than anybody else did and she loved Michael kids to too. prince michael the first Paris and Prince Michael the second aka blanket R.I.P...
    Anonymous 7/26/09 Reply
  • I hope that mj's mom or janet jackson or the other sister get's the custody of the kids. Because I think they will be better off with the jackson family.Besides it is in mj's will so they should honor his wishes.so maybe now he can finally be in...
    Anonymous 7/25/09 Reply
  • Mihceal Jackson was a very good father. I think janet should keep the children because kathrine can't manage the kids by here self and janet is very kind and she whould do a good job and she whould be just like her brother R.I.P Michael Jackson and...
    Anonymous 7/24/09 Reply
  • It is bad enough that these poor children have lost their dad, but to have to deal with a custody battle is just wrong on so many levels. As far as the kids being Michael's, well here goes. Anyone can donate sperm, but to be there daily thru the ups...
    Anonymous 7/24/09 Reply
  • i think that the jackson's should get the kids because they have been with the kids more than debbie rowe has and i think that all she wants is the money she doesn't care about the kids if she cared she would have tried to get her perental rights...
    Anonymous 7/24/09 Reply
  • If Debbie Rowe really loves her children, why did she tell everybody that the children are not Micheal Jackson's biological children? Prince and Paris loves Micheal so much. Did she considered the privacy of the identity of her kids? The world know...
    dr.acfelix 7/23/09 Reply
  • Whether Debbie is the bio mother or not, i think she should be the one who look after these kids if she wants too surely. I think MJ will be happy abt that since initialy they planned to have these kids together lon tyme ago so she has to continue...
    Anonymous 7/23/09 Reply
  • To all you so called (FANS) out there, so worried about who is going to raise those poor children, its in Gods hands!They are children, they just lost their Father, leave them out of the public fight! Let them choose who they want and trust to raise...
    Anonymous 7/23/09 Reply
  • I think it is all so sad.Leave the children where they are!Debbie was just A buisness partner for A short while,she did not want them when Michael was alive let them live in peace...One last note DNA DOES NOT MAKE ONE A FATHER,LOVE MAKES A...
    Anonymous 7/22/09 Reply
  • i think that debbie rowe wants the money i think the 3angles should stay with MJ family coz thats wat MJ wanted...i mean the world the court should open ther mind and eye every one can tell debbie is seekin to custody MJ money she's not seekin for...
    Anonymous 7/18/09 Reply
  • I think Micheal's family should keep these kids because they are Micheal kids it not matter what order people were saying.Bebbie have nothing to do with children she should live them alone and go take care of her animals.
    Anonymous 7/15/09 Reply
  • I think all the kids should go to their grand monther . they all ready lost thier dad . they don,t know thier monther. all they had , was thier dad
    Anonymous 7/15/09 Reply
  • i truly believe that the kids should remain with the jacksons.catherine jackson will be a wonderfull mom for these kids.she was an magnificent mom for michael and she did an outstanding job in rasing him.michael knew that knew it enough to give her...
    Anonymous 7/14/09 Reply
    • i believe Janet should get custody of the kids... she is always with them anyway... she seems to treat them like kids that they are and not assest!
      Anonymous 7/14/09
View More Comments
Write a Comment