(The views expressed by our guest columnists are not necessarily those of the Celebrity Baby Blog.)
I thought for a while about not writing this post. It involves Britney Spears and for a gazillion reasons I don't want to be yet another writer/reporter/blogger/person writing about her and her endless issues. It also makes some pretty big generalizations based on a few data points and that's not my favorite type of post. But I just couldn't make it go away, I kept thinking about it, and so here goes.
This weekend I was browsing through The New York Times online (the only way I get to catch up on reading the paper these days, during nap time, while taking a 10-minute break from work) and came across an article titled Boys Will Be Boys, Girls Will Be Hounded By The Media. It's main point is the fact that the press seems to be much harsher and tougher on women celebrities than on men. (E.g. When Kiefer Sutherland got released from jail, most media outlets ignored the event, but a panacea of coverage erupted when Paris Hilton returned to complete her jail sentence.)
Click Continue Reading for more.
I'm not what you'd call a celebrity junkie (OK, I read through US Weekly when I am stuck at an airport), so I was ready to move on to the next article when I read this:
If Britney weren’t a mother, this story wouldn’t be getting a fraction of attention it’s getting... The fact that the custody of her children is at stake is the fuel of this narrative. If she were a single woman, bombing around in her car with paparazzi following, it wouldn’t be the same.
I agree. When I saw footage of Britney riding around in a car with her son on her lap I couldn't believe it and when I see coverage of her demise I usually think about her poor kids and how it's affecting them. And since the majority of celebrity magazine readers are women and many of them moms, it makes sense that her story keeps getting coverage -- it causes reactions and reactions sell copies
.
But -- and here it is the big generalization I warned about -- I think one of the reasons Britney's being a mom is fueling the media coverage is because we (and by this I mean, we, people, Americans) tend to be more critical of moms in general. I remembered a study I read a while back about Americans being more critical of the job moms are doing today compared to a generation ago than dads, as compared to the previous generation of fathers. (You can read more about it and some Work It, Mom! member comments here.) Mommy wars get a ton more coverage than daddy wars. Heck, even my own mom is a lot more critical of me now that I am a mom (but we'll leave that for another blog post.)
Part of me thinks our society has the right to be more critical of moms because we have one of the most incredible responsibilities I know of -- raising children. But c'mon, the 1950s are done with and many fathers are as involved, if not more, in raising kids and impacting their future. So shouldn't we see more critical stories about celebrity dads who aren't doing their jobs? And maybe even more importantly, don't moms have enough to deal with without more pressure and scrutiny?
I feel a bit like a fish out of water writing a post about celebrities, so sound off with your thoughts in the comments and don't leave me contemplating here alone.
Do you feel we're more critical of moms than dads? Women than men? Why?
Photo by Flynet.
Celebrity Baby Blog
DISCLAIMER: This posting was submitted by a user of the site not from The Insider editorial staff. All users have acknowledged and agreed that the submission of their story and its contents is in compliance with our Terms of Use.






Kevin Federline agreed to go on tour with Britney so their two sons can be on the road with their mom. Thoughts?
Comments (1)